Friday, December 18, 2009

Who are the major oil suppliers for the United States?

My mom heard from a radio program that our top supplier is Mexico, and that the second is Canada. I have been searching the web for about half an hour and haven't been able to find any proof or disproof of this. Does anyone know where to go to find out this information?Who are the major oil suppliers for the United States?
Mexico, because transportation costs.





... and because you can麓t live with out us!Who are the major oil suppliers for the United States?
we get our oil from a organization called opec. Look opec up on google. They recieve oil from locations world wide and sell it as a auction type of sale. they set the price based on consumer demand and if the price is too high the less rich countrys have to drop out leaving the super powers all the oil.





we have not decided on using canada becuase of the cost of getting it from the ground.





Also many people think we are in iraq for there oil since the oil is soo close to the surface. It would only cost 1 dollar per barrel and could be sold for around 60 dollars.





-hope that helps
Mexico, Venezuela, and Canada for other energy sources. Saudi Arabia is only 8%.
路 ';The largest bilateral energy trade in the world is between the United States and Canada. Canada is the largest source of U.S. imports of oil, natural gas, uranium, and electricity.';





this is a quote I found on this website http://canada.usembassy.gov/content/text鈥?/a>





I hope this clears a few misconceptions up.
Venezuela, Saudi Arabia
almost all the oil producers in the world are top suppliers for the US , yes mex and can are amongst those, but you can saudi arabia and venezuela.
Dear Dude:


We live in the age of disinformation. The ages are getting darker and darker. And I wanted to share with you the following facts: If you agree with me please send them to as many friends of you as possible...





The transnational companies which are using American government and ARMY to sip oil from Iraq are paying back with the money they have earned by selling the oil they have been continuously stealing from Iraq. They will do the same in Iran and Venezuella.





You won't believe it but some transnational companies are there to force the Yahoo Corp. to delete my questions here. But I am continuously changing my name to hide it from them. Until they find me, thousands of people will have learned that America is no more controlled by its national companies. Transnational companies are a great threat both for America and the world. A transnational company is one that feels no loyalty to any nation. They don鈥檛 pay any taxes to any government and they are strong enough to overthrow governments all over the world. For the time being they are using Americans. They threat America by the fact that if they draw their capital and investments from America 25 % of its population will be jobless.





The fight and the tension between the members of the Senate is in fact a fight between the American and non-American capital owners. Right after the 9/11 the nationalistic or loyal American capital owners became a little bit stronger and passed a decree from the senate to the effect that the central government and the states are to buy their weapons from NATIONAL war industries... But at present non-American capital owners have become stronger enough to sip petroleum out of Iraq by using American ARMY. This is the horrible fact about American Politics and Bush is not loyal to America.





Sorry for the terrible English. Wish you prosperity and happiness. I am a mere warrior to enlighten people about facts.鈥?Yes, they are my facts. But believe me they aren鈥檛 groundless.
  • windows web server
  • When will the oil companies start trying to recover oil from the oil shale in the western states?

    It appears that the question period has expired. If you have received an answer that meets your needs, please choose a 'best answer.'


    Regards.When will the oil companies start trying to recover oil from the oil shale in the western states?
    They have already started. Method is economical and practical now. Just got keep the tree huggers and hunters away. Work in PetroChem as a consultant and we are sending equipment that way. Look to Imperial Oil/Encana in Canada to find out more. Also check out Hart's Online Digest.

    Does anyone know if the oil business in the united states is going to get better?

    My husband works in the oil field and things have been really slow does anyone know if things are supposed to be picking up at all?Does anyone know if the oil business in the united states is going to get better?
    Rig counts have dropped off more than 50 percent since the end of August. Natural gas prices determine drilling and prices are very low right now. High oil prices should stabilize drilling but it wont increase drilling much. We have huge amounts of natural gas in storage and it usually increases in the summer months. With huge inventories and a weak economy I dont see prices or drilling picking up significantly for a year or two. I grew up around the drilling business in several different states. So I can understand how you feel. Its always been a cyclical business. Busts happen about once a decade. It happened in the 60s, 80s and 90s. It skipped the 70s because the embargos and shortages kept prices up. We paid for it in the 80s with one of the worst busts. Some people, who had worked in the oilfield for decades left the business never to work in it again in their careers. And some of the largest and oldest drilling companies went out of business. This bust is the worst since then. It has nothing to do with fields being exhausted. Its a simple supply and demand relationship. Enhanced drilling and recovery methods keep old fields producing and new fields producing more. That and high prices in the recent past are why we have such huge supplies now. And geologists are constantly sifting through old well logs of dry holes to see if they missed something. Environmentalists have more to do with it, not allowing drilling in places like the Wyoming Range and other places. Drilling isnt dead, its just going through a normal cycle..Does anyone know if the oil business in the united states is going to get better?
    Certainly oil is going to be a sure fire money maker for the foreseeable future in spite of the present downturn. My only concern would be that as easy fields are exhausted your husband might have to move to tar sand, off-shore or polar fields.





    There is a need to reduce reliance on oil because it is becoming more expensive to extract (as easy fields dry up) and for climate change reasons but oil has so many vital uses employment prospects should remain good.





    Best wishes
    Sure. Things are slow now because oil is down on the world market. It is increasing day by day, it hit $71.00 today. When Israel attacks Iran, and we attack North Korea, oil prices will surge and those in the oil industry will see a positive benefit.
    I would think so, oil is at 70 per barrel. I would expect activity to increase soon.
    A friend of mine dates the daughter of a gas station operator and he says meby. Hope this helps.
    Andy


    They will, but what go's up must come down, and bounce back it will.
    Hubby will be joining the dole cue hun. We're doing away with oil, think of the planet %26amp; all ;)

    Who is more dependent on oil is it europe or united states?

    Also does anybody know as to who (us or Europe) is prepared better should an oil crunch occur in future. What time frame in future are we looking at.Who is more dependent on oil is it europe or united states?
    Europe doesn't have hardly any production, compared to the US. Britain, for example, has almost none.





    We import a liitle more than half of our oil, but our economy is larger.





    For all purposes, we would both be in a world of hurt in an oil crunch.Who is more dependent on oil is it europe or united states?
    US
    The U S is far more dependent on oil, even though the produce more than Europe. Europe has much better public transportation. They actually have a working rail system. Can you imagine that? Rail is 10 more efficient than auto transportation and 40 times more efficient than air trasportaion. France has much larger portion of power generation based on nuclear about 40% if I recall correctly.





    Gasoline is heavily taxed in Europe so Europeans tend to not use nearly so much. Very few SUV's there.





    If there is a crunch, the U S might very well collapse from the crunch. Do you have any idea how many people commute to work each day over 50 miles each way. It is millions.
    the US and i can not wait until the oil drops to 10 bucks all these big oil companies soaking us, its payback time
    The U.S. is probably more dependent on oil for a lot of reasons, mostly lifestyle ones. so any oil crunch would hurt.


    One should really look globally though as economies have gone that way.


    The US has enough domestic production that if other world sources were to stop. essential services could still happen. Countries who depend on others for their product would (exporters) would probably be hurt more in the long run as they would not be able to get their product out. The US currently imports more than they export so the US could ramp up production of items it used to make but now import.





    This is strictly my opinion
    The U.S. by far. Europe has a much better public transportation system and less people rely on their cars there vs. the U.S. In addition, everything is much closer together there compared to here so that reduces their need to drive a lot. That, plus their cars are much more fuel-efficient than our gas-guzzling SUVs.

    Should states that refuse to drill for oil in their own states should have higher gas tax?

    than a state that does. For example your state doesn't have any oil in it your state is exempt. but if your state does have oil in it and it refuse to drill i think those states should pay a lot more in taxes than the states that do.Should states that refuse to drill for oil in their own states should have higher gas tax?
    most states can,t drill for oil, so how can they be taxed for something they can,t do. we need to tax congress if they don,t allow drilling or nuclear.Should states that refuse to drill for oil in their own states should have higher gas tax?
    To begin with, there aren't any states that drill for oil-companies drill for oil to make profit.The potential for such feasible oil discovery/extraction exists in precious few of our 50 United States. You seem to assume a level playing field leaves each state with the choice of yes or no. Often, it's something beyond the omnipotent power of the state that makes exploration/extraction decisions, and they seldom follow the lines on a state map.


    You'll need to re-think your taxation, and base it on something other than the geography of the earth being such a determining factor.





    INSTEAD, why not institute an arbitrary tax? Maybe a pro-rata on states with more than two vowels in their names?


    Maybe charge more for states that eat the most bananas, per-capita? Extra charge those states that haven't produced a Supreme Court Judge!


    The sky's the limit!
    No.





    It is is federal regulations that prevent new drilling, not the individual states.





    Ultimately it is the federal government that decides if any new drilling can happen.
    An import tax for Gasoline crossing state lines?


    Harry Reid wants just the opposite,more taxes on the producers and the users.
    No. Really lame suggestion. Instead lets have the states without oil pay a worthless tax.
    States set their gas tax based on how much money they need to maintain their infrastructure.
    Sure if you are in a socialist country they would. but since we live a free-market economy, they can refuse to drill and buy it anywhere else they want.

    Why is Obama so against the United States drilling for our own oil?

    Is this going to be the biggest losing issue for the Democrats and Obama?Why is Obama so against the United States drilling for our own oil?
    He's not.





    But the bigger question is this: Why don't the oil companies drill on the 68 million acres of land that they already have?





    If you think we're paying high gas prices now, just give the oil companies more acres.





    They'll have a monopoly then and gas prices will go through the roof.Why is Obama so against the United States drilling for our own oil?
    He is against harming our environment when it isn't really necessary. There is a reason for the ban on Off-shore drilling. McCain was always against it until he started running for president. He admits it won't help much and said it will have a psychological effect on the American people. McCain not only voted against Off-Shore drilling but voted against a Bill that would ensure that if the Ban was lifted, the oil would stay in America.
    Because drilling for oil does not solve our energy problem. It would just dig ourselves deeper into a hole by procrastinating. Why not use our innovation to develop clean, alternative energy sources? Not to mention the fact that we don't have enough oil to make a serious impact on the price of gas. And even if we did, the affects wouldn't be felt until about ten years from now. As if that's not bleak enough, there would only be enough oil to last for a fraction of a year. Plus the question of environmentalism has to be taken into account. It could harm the environment when it is drilled. Burning more oil would also contribute to more greenhouse gas emissions and worsen climate change.





    I acknowledge that the majority of Americans support drilling in/around the U.S., but I don't think this one issue is going to be the biggest drawback associated with Obama. I think that if more people knew the reality surrounding the facts of drilling, they would not support it. We should realize that drilling for oil isn't the ';magic wand'; that it is made out to be by some.
    obama wants to drill for our own oil, but not in places where the wildlife will be permantly damaged.





    studies show that we do drills in alaska, yes, we will find oil, but just enough that will last us for ONE year. that's permanent damage for temporary supply and it's a terrible way to approach the problem.





    our oil locations now still have oil, but we aren't developing the right technology to get to it. let's improve our education status, get some smarter people, and find ways to take advantage of the safe places we have to dig for oil. that's the way to go
    When it comes to oil drilling Obama is an idiot as are many of those that have responded here, showing they know nothing about how oil is handled here in the US.





    First and foremost, over 93% of the current, untapped, oil leases in the US are being blocked by over 800 lawsuits from environmental groups,





    Obama looking to keep the favor of these groups opposes oil drilling on the OCS or ANWR, etc. Of course it's OK that Mexico, Canada, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela and Guyana have oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico sucking oil out from underneath Florida.





    Obama is willing to sell us all out for his own persional gain. He will win the honor of being Jimmy Carter II.
    We do drill for our own oil. 15% of US waters are available for drilling. The oil companies simply aren't using it.


    There is no ban on drilling, simply a moratorium on new leases. This moratorium was introduced in 1982 and confirmed every year since by congress (including the 12 years congress was controlled by Republicans). It was also the purpose of a presidential order issued by George HW Bush (hardly an anti-oil man now is he) in 1990.


    So Obama's support for the moratorium is hardly just his, or even just the Dems. And it will not be a losing issue - rather the continued misrepresentation of it by the Republicans will come back to haunt them.
    I won't answer this for Obama, but I can tell you that we have enough oil that is on privately owned land to supply all of America, however, the oil companies have to pay a lot of money to drill that oil. Oil that is drilled off shore can cause an abundant amount of damage to our (that includes YOU and your health) and to the animals who have no voice in the matter. And, it doesn't cost the oil companies as much money to drill. Look up the health consequences from the chemicals used to get the oil out, both for humans and for animals. We have enough oil already available to drill without going off shore, or on protected land. Our military's number one goal is to get as much oil as we can. It's called ';point of balance.'; The high prices we are paying is just to get people mad enough to want to drill on protected land and sea. It's all about BIG profits. The oil company's made 38 BILLION dollars profit last year. You are being fooled by some very top notch people who work for the oil companies.
    We can drill the 68 million acres that nobody can find except a few democrats and they are not telling where it is. They also seem to know how much oil is down there without doing any exploratory drilling.





    Gosh they are smart - they should have gone into the oil business.





    On 30 Sept the congress will have to allow drilling or pass another ban. Guess that is when I will know how I am going to vote.





    Right or wrong if they cannot follow the will of the people, they need to be out. That's what they get paid for.
    It's much easier to control the masses - when you control their very livlihood; and besides - we don't know what kind of deals might be in the works with his middle-eastern friends.


    The more we rely on them - the less we rely on ourselves. It is clear Obama does not understand how our dependence on oil leaves us at the beck and call of the middle-east Oil Kings, and they will continue to hold us hostage with oil until we break the endless cycle.





    Obama is a loser.
    In response to those questioning drilling on those Acres.


    Is off shore drilling is a lot more cleaner, safer, and economically better. DO you want to pay at the pump for all the drilling that will lead no where? Or explore the coast, that Cuba, and China are also researching. Technology makes off shore drilling more practical..
    Its a populous scheme to get the average moron to join him against the evil gas guy who screws you at every turn.


    They keep saying there is several million acres the gas man can drilll for oil. They want the oil co. to dril on dry fields for a while so they wont have to answer to the environmental lobby.
    Its the height of hypocrisy....Where do these latte liberals get off making other countries DRILL on their own lands and off shores and say no to our own drilling? Is their lands less valuable?





    Its ok if we drill and take their resources, but not ours? These people's logic is baffling.
    Drilling for more oil is not the answer -building refineries and using Green power - solar and wind is the answer. Electric cars will be the first new green powered car -who knows what great innovative idea will be next -perhaps Hydrogen.


    Go Obama
    Because it wont solve anything. Gas prices will still be high as hell and people will just keep using it up.





    A better alternative is to find other ways to fuel your car.





    More options/competition make prices go down.
    Maybe for the same reason the oil company execs. are against it.
    don't vote for him he's doing that because he's a stupid environmentalist





    vote libertarian
    B/c it would take 7 years to have it in our gas stations.





    As if 7 years was that bad when compared to never...that idiot.
    He wants gas to go up if we drilled here the price would down
    He doesn't want his Islamic buddies in the Middle East to lose business.
    He wants his buddy's in the middle east to get all the profits.
    We do drill for our own oil.
    I dont know why ANYONE is so against drilling for our own oil to be honest...
    He's not. The oil companies have tens of thousands of unexplored leased acres to drill on. Funny they don't seem to be anxious to set up new drilling operations OR the new refineries we would need.

    If the United States produced enough crude oil to be self-sustaining would it bring down the price of our fuel

    Our government wants to drill more in the US. Would this REALLY bring our gas prices down???If the United States produced enough crude oil to be self-sustaining would it bring down the price of our fuel
    If we could it get that much by drilling it would increase the world supply by over 10% which i s enough to lower prices for a few years but increased demand from china would drive it up again. However one of our big problems is the loss of value of the dollar which is caused by the trade deficit and inported oil is a major factor in this.If the United States produced enough crude oil to be self-sustaining would it bring down the price of our fuel
    If it were possible it would probably drop the price of a barrel of oil to under $10. But it's not possible. But just the announcement that the US is going to allow drilling in coastal waters and Alaska would rapidly drop the price of a barrel to under $100. A big part of the run-up in the price of oil is the fact that the US has no energy policy at all. Other then a moronic ethanol mandate. If the speculators were given some sense that the US is actually going to do something to curb our reliance on foreign oil, it would have an immediate and profound effect on the price of oil. The price of a barrel of oil is not based on what it costs to produce. It is based upon how much people are willing to pay. If it became apparent that the US was no longer willing to pay $100 for a barrel of oil, and that we were actually going to do something about it, besides just complain, it would have an immediate effect upon the price of oil. Ideally, we not only need to start drilling for oil wherever feasible, but we need a realistic alternative fuels policy. That means wind, solar, and nuclear. The oil crisis could be a thing of the past within 25 years. All that we need is an administration that is committed to an aggressive energy policy.





    EDIT: Silly Person, the reason that the price of oil is at $145 a barrel is because the global demand for oil continues to increase, while the global supply appears to have peaked. But if you reversed those two factors, and instituted a two prong energy policy in the US, whereby you intend to increase the supply, and at the same time reduce demand, the effect upon the price of oil would be immediate and profound.
    I bought millions and millions of barrels of oil when they cost $60--$100 a barrel. I expect to make a kill when I sell. But right now it’s only over $140 a barrel. So here is my difficulty :





    I have requested my agents spin the media, like: “Oil future looks high, expecting to be in the range of $200 a barrel soon” But it does not work price up fast enough.





    I have paid the mainstream media, the Think Tanks, and the major PR talking heads, to spin China and India (supply and demand) responsible for price hike, to deflect American public anger. But that does not go far enough.





    Right now, I am extremely nervous and worried. I urgently need a prey to buy those “paper barrels” on my hording. So I can profit. But where can I find my prey ?





    ADD:


    Airline industry has requested and demanded Congress stop oil speculation. I have my lobby on Capitol Hill work the Senators and Congressmen around the clock. But I do not how long they can hold.


    Airlines urge Congress to curb oil speculation


    http://www.boston.com/business/articles/…
    Not by much. U.S. oil production peaked in 1970...
    No because peak oil has been reached oil is a finite resource and its running out time to face up to that, the price of oil we never be low again.
    I've heard a lot of people call for drilling in our nation, especially in the Gulf Coast area. And I see why they would want us to drill there- its totally understandable with high gas prices and so much foreign oil that we use. However, it would not be a good idea to drill in our own country. Not only are there enviornmental effects, but there isn't going to be a very high amount of oil to be produced in the Gulf Oil for a while...as for drilling in Alaska, we wouldn't produce a significant amount of oil for a while either. and when we do produce that amount, likely near 2030, it won't affect oil prices by much (maybe $1.44/barrel reduction according to a report by the White House Energy Information Administration) (And that may even be offset by OPEC).





    Report by Energy Information Administration on offshore drilling-


    http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/otherana…





    It states we won't have a significant amount of oil offshore (produced) until 2030.





    Same group's report on Drilling in Alaska. As I mentioned earlier their findings state that we won't lwoer oil prices by much from oil in Alaska


    http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/a…





    This is a White House organization saying this- not an environmental group. I think we should not be investing in domestic oil production. Rather we should be using clean alternate energy. It reduces pollution, and more importantly, lasts longer (more permanent than oil)-- even if it takes a while to make, we should be more dependent on alternate energy, within the next 20 years to say the least, than with oil. We've already started looking into it and we should increase our funding and incentives in it.
  • windows web server
  •